Reading science fiction stories allows people with inadequate grasp in English to improve their grammar skills. Talking and writing in broken English is the result of not understanding how the structure of the English sentence work. Through routine reading, you will learn the correct way to write a correct English sentence. You will find sci-fi stories at different reading problem levels. You can start in the one with simple reading difficulty level which has shorter duration and then gradually progress to reading stories together with harder studying difficulty that have more duration.
As you browse the science fiction story, you will encounter words you don’t understand. Each time you locate a challenging word, you should look up the dictionary and find out its significance. If you did not purchase a dictionary, you can use the online dictionary to look up the meaning of this word. You can learn how to pronounce the new word correctly by playing the audio to your pronunciation in the internet dictionary. The more science fiction tales you see, the more wide your vocabulary will become.
Well, that depends on the type of story you are writing. The length of your tale will dictate the quantity of character information you will have to make them come to life. For simplicity’s sake, I have broken my character sheet into what I use for each type of writing. Your character sheets may vary.
Fiction with its very definition is unreal. After we read a novel we know that the story and the characters in it are only a product of creativity of the writer. When we view a movie we are aware that the characters are only acting their parts essentially pretending to be somebody besides themselves. Still we’re mentally affected by the twists and turns in the story. We laugh with them, weep with them, and also sense indignant towards the bad guys. The adorable hero or heroine might be despicable in real life and the villain might be a perfect gentleman, but we identify them using the characters they’re portraying. In essence for that short period we ourselves get transported into the imaginary world of the writer. Strangely enough this happens too with the writer at least to some of these. He or she travels through the very same emotions while writing and possibly later as well. The effects of this article, not only on you but many others, is a fact that has to be acknowledged. Sometimes there is simply way too much to even try to cover in one go, and that is important for you to recognize and take home. But I wanted to pause for a moment so you can reflect on the importance of what you have just read. In light of all that is offered, and there is a lot, then this is a great time to be reading this. The last remaining areas for discussion may be even more important.
“Knowledge is limited, imagination is not.” Albert Einstein explained that although the wording of the next part could have been different. Einstein like any other human being wasn’t infallible. A number of his views he held right until the end turned out to be incorrect even in the subject of physics. In this particular statement he also appears to have it backwards. Knowledge may be limited in the case of someone but generally it is unlimited even when we consider just rational understanding leaving apart transcendental. Science in particular has demonstrated this at each step in the course of its development. Imagination pertains to an individual mind and can be constrained by several factors based on the circumstances of the person. A mind can imagine only what relates in a way to things already stored in it. A person that has been outdoors a distant location in jungle and has no contact with the world outside cannot imagine what metropolitan cities are like.
Getting back to fiction the creativity of the author also must be predicated on his direct or indirect experiences. In this sense fiction relies on fact and to that extent it represents another dimension of truth. Here of course we run into the philosophical problem of the exact meaning of reality. You will find two diametrically opposite viewpoints – materialistic and spiritualistic. According to the prior only things which can be perceived through our perceptions are real, everything else is unreal. The latter maintains that there’s one ultimate reality from which all that we perceive comes out and everything that is perceived is simply an illusion. We look at a statement by Einstein: “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one.” He was clearly referring to the reality of the phenomenal world. The word illusion can have different connotations but generally it means perceiving something as different from what it is. Therefore the presence of the thing is a prerequisite for illusion, it isn’t a mental construction. Imagination is purely a mental phenomenon and has nothing to do with anything really existent. Thus the relationship between fiction and reality is entirely different from that between illusion and reality. It does take some time to write a complete story for any kind of book.
At a philosophical sense that the incredible world itself may be regarded as fiction. This is exactly what Shakespeare perhaps meant when he wrote: “All the world’s a stage, and all men and women merely players”. We may as well think of everything in the universe (space, time, matter) as players because everything has its entry and exit. We naturally run into the issue of stating what the point is and who wrote the script. Shakespeare likely believed in God, strict determinism, and at the reality of earth, so he didn’t have this issue. Now it is usually believed that the universe also has a beginning and will have an ending. If the universe is also a participant, are there multiple universes or does it come exclusively on the platform and then presents other players? But what is the point in this case? Quantum physics points to one possibility. At extremely tiny scales of space and time there’s a quantum emptiness that’s not really empty but full of energy which is constantly transforming itself to virtual particles and back. What remains after the conclusion of the world could possibly be an infinite version of this quantum emptiness full of energy into which all the thing has converted itself. This universal energy is the source of and background for all.
It is not only a philosophical point. We spend a considerable part of our own life from the imagined or fictional universe. We muse about the things in future and live over the past imagining what might have been. The imagination about the future is based on our hopes and ambitions and to some extent it is a positive in the sense that we are in a position to mold our future when we sincerely attempt. But musing over the past is really a futile exercise since we know for a fact that ‘what might have been’ is mere fantasy that never happened. Nevertheless it serves the exact same purpose as fiction from the point of view of amusement. We entertain ourselves by imagining how life could have been, knowing fully well that it has no fact whatsoever. In a metaphorical sense past, at least the remote past, is fiction. In a certain sense history itself is fiction as it always includes the abstract bias of the writer. What we know of Buddha and Jesus today is more fiction than truth.